Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sd.Kfz 234-2 front-diagonal view.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Sd.Kfz 234-2 front-diagonal view.jpg[edit]
The source says "© IWM STT 7865", not work by the UK government, but also watermarked. 2001:4451:8216:1700:8198:F528:D57C:9EE 14:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Check the IWM copyright statement https://www.iwm.org.uk/corporate/policies/copyright
- Also this Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/02#Advice_on_migrating_image_from_Wikipedia GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:45, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Per COM:PCP as explained, the creator is exactly unknown but it's still uncertain when it was created by the British government, or possibly by the Germans. 2001:4451:8216:1700:45F8:54F6:3310:D404 00:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep per Denniss in this edit. IWM stands for Imperial War Museum (or Museums), part of the UK government which used to claim Crown Copyright. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- I believe this isn't a work of a UK government official, I believed this is a lack of licensing issues over COM:PCP. 2001:4451:8216:1700:45F8:54F6:3310:D404 10:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- To believe something better go to church. We have a release from IWM and we should stick to it. Yes Archives sometime make errors or wrong attributions but unless such an error is proven the image is fine. --Denniss (talk) 08:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- That's suspicious, see copyright ownership dispute discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:State_Ceremonial_Music_-_God_Save_the_Queen.ogg. 2001:4451:82C1:400:D1C1:3EAB:8423:5E9F 11:55, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- To believe something better go to church. We have a release from IWM and we should stick to it. Yes Archives sometime make errors or wrong attributions but unless such an error is proven the image is fine. --Denniss (talk) 08:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- I believe this isn't a work of a UK government official, I believed this is a lack of licensing issues over COM:PCP. 2001:4451:8216:1700:45F8:54F6:3310:D404 10:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: As we have the explicit statement from the IWM, we would need evidence specific to this image to counter it. —howcheng {chat} 21:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
